Keeping Off the Fake News and Misinformation
One of the greatest ethical and epistemic responsibilities of each person in the current times is to keep themselves away from fake news and misinformation. Keeping guard against it will help us protect our whole personality and how we behave towards our fellow beings. How we deal with it underpins the projection of our social behaviour.
As a source of knowledge, information, misinformation or
disinformation, the news which is fed to us through TV sets and web portals is
of the testimonial nature. It involves someone or something conveying it by
telling, which can take different forms including broadcasting and writing. In
this regard, two human instincts play an important role when it comes to
dealing with such sources, namely the principle of veracity and the
principle of credulity. To put them simply, these two principles say that
we humans in normal circumstances often tend to tell truth and we tend to
believe what other people tell us; there’s a disposition towards truthfulness
and trustfulness on our part. However, only a moment’s reflection suffices to reveal
their ambivalent nature. Given their instinctual nature, they easily become
vicious tool of spreading rumours, misinformation and fake news. It doesn’t
take too much effort to turn truthfulness into deceitfulness and trustfulness
into gullibility. Since each of us is born with these two instincts, every one
of us is morally responsible to keep off the fake news, rumours or any kind of
misinformation and prevent it from spreading.
Now the question is, what are the methods and tools we can
use to ward off fake news and misinformation? Do we have to use technological
tools or certain measures on our part will do? I believe we have to first educate
and train ourselves in this matter. Technology-based tools in themselves will
be ineffective as long as we ourselves do not use our innate faculties
properly. In the end responsibility lies
in every individual who’s exposed to any kind of news or information. And it doesn’t
take too much to equip ourselves with such human tools as to keep us protected
from any kind of fake news and misinformation. In this connection, there’s a
need of an attitude that one must develop in oneself, and which should get
reflected in us as being a little cautious, inquisitive and skeptic.
Donald A. Barclay, the author of the book Fake News,
Propaganda and Plain Old Lies, has come up with a set of nine essential
questions, each of which has a list of sub-questions which must be asked in
order to evaluate any information. I will not list down all of those nine
questions here, but a few are very important to be commented upon. These have
to do with the creation, dissemination and temporal relevance of information.
Whenever you come across any news or information, ask who created it. Asking
such question involves getting to know the character and credibility of the
author, making sure whoever has created the information under discussion is
identifiable and possesses required expertise to write or speak on whatever the
content is. Then look for the means which the author has used to publish this
information. Following Barclay, I’ll call this means publisher. Publisher is
the conduit through which information reaches the public. So it’s as important
an element as the information and author themselves. It’s through publishing
that information becomes news. Like the author, the publisher must be evaluated
along the two axes of character and credibility. In addition, look for the
biases and conflict of interests which might be there disguised under the
sensational headlines. Another important question to be asked is related to the
date and time of information. I have often seen people on social media sharing
outdated posts and news articles. Some people even share posts containing
requests for monetary aids and blood donations which are years old. Similarly
some old news or piece of information, which has completely lost its relevance,
is spread without paying any attention to the date of its creation.
Contemporary philosopher Nicholas Rescher says that trusting someone’s information is like extending them credit. When they prove unworthy of it, stop giving it. Now in order not to lose our truthfulness and not to be in debt of ignorance ever, these are some of the questions which we on human level are capable of asking: Who created the information? Who published the information? How old is the information? They are the tools to fight ignorance and deceit.
Greater Kashmir
Comments
Post a Comment